Primary surface
Translates product rules into checks for routes, APIs, roles, and data.
Define product-specific security policies for SafeVibe checks, exceptions, route classes, data handling, and governance evidence.
Page intent
productCustom security policies that make product-specific rules testable and repeatable.
This page is built as a product surface, not a brochure fragment: it explains the user problem, the security workflow, and the evidence a team should be able to show after the work is done.
Custom security policies that make product-specific rules testable and repeatable. It is written for enterprise product teams, security leaders, platform governance teams, and compliance owners, with the review anchored in the real application paths, roles, data, and evidence that drive the decision.
Translates product rules into checks for routes, APIs, roles, and data.
Supports exceptions with owner, rationale, scope, and review dates.
Aligns findings with the policy version used during review.
Reports policy coverage across products and teams.
Generic checks miss team-specific data handling or route rules.
Policy exceptions live in documents but not in the security workflow.
Different products apply inconsistent standards to similar risks.
Reviewers cannot prove which policy was applied to a finding.
Translates product rules into checks for routes, APIs, roles, and data.
Supports exceptions with owner, rationale, scope, and review dates.
Aligns findings with the policy version used during review.
Reports policy coverage across products and teams.
Define policy rules by product surface and data class.
Apply checks during scans, PR review, and remediation.
Record exceptions and required compensating controls.
Review policy drift after releases and governance changes.
policy rule library
exception register
policy-to-finding mapping
governance review summary
Generic checks miss team-specific data handling or route rules.
Policy exceptions live in documents but not in the security workflow.
policy rule library
Different products apply inconsistent standards to similar risks.
Generic checks miss team-specific data handling or route rules.
Policy exceptions live in documents but not in the security workflow.
Different products apply inconsistent standards to similar risks.
Reviewers cannot prove which policy was applied to a finding.
Enterprise products often need rules that reflect their data, buyers, regulatory pressure, and internal risk appetite.
Yes. Policies can differ by product line, route class, data sensitivity, environment, and customer commitment.
Exceptions should include a reason, owner, affected scope, review date, and any compensating control.
Governance gets evidence of which policies were checked, where exceptions exist, and which findings remain open.
See how Custom security policies turns into scans, findings, fixes, and evidence inside a real SafeVibe workspace.